![pdftomusic pro evaluation mode pdftomusic pro evaluation mode](https://helpserver.biz/onlinehelp/lp/easygo/5.0/help2000/images/start-noevalmode.png)
That only problem is that Paul claims elsewhere that there are no other gods by nature except the one creator God (Galatians 4:8 cf. This view of Satan is compatible with someone who blinds the “minds” of people, as in 4:4. As well, Satan is identified as a deceiver, akin with the seduction of Corinthian “minds” in 2 Corinthians (2 Cor 11:13-15 cf. The aiȏnos in 2 Cor 4:4 may refer to the fallen world comprising of people who are subject to Satan (see the implications of this in 1 Cor 2:8–10 5:5). It so happens that latter on in Paul’s same letter-2 Corinthians 6:14–7:1-Paul will mention Beliar by name as a demonic power opposed to Christ. (Though one suspects early Christian interpolation here.) He leads others into apostasy, and he will even participate in hanging the Messiah on a tree ( Asc. In essence, he is the god of this world or present age. And witchcraft and magic increased and divination and auguration, and fornication,, and the persecution of the righteous by Manasseh…” īeliar (also connected with the word, belial – Hebrew for worthless, lawless) is an angel who seems to be more or less synonymous with Satan, embodies a king, and rules over the world as the ruler of that world. And he delighted in Jerusalem because of Manasseh, and he made him strong in apostatizing (Israel) and in the lawlessness which was spread abroad in Jerusalem. “And Manasseh turned aside his heart to serve Beliar for the angel of lawlessness, who is the ruler of this world, is Beliar, whose name is Matanbûchûs. We notice the parallel in Martyrdom and Ascension of Isaiah: This view and character finds support in Jewish apocalyptic literature, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls (e.g., The War Scroll ), Jubilees, Testament of the Twelve, and other ancient sources. Is this “god” Satan or Beliar (a name or entity associated with Satan)?.The problem with this view is that this entity plays an active role in the blinding, and so we might expect an intelligent personal being is behind this deception. For example, Paul speaks of enemies of the cross of Christ, whose “god is their belly” (Philippians 3:18–19). This metaphorical understanding of the word “god” is evident elsewhere in Paul. The “god of this world” could then be understood as “the god, namely, this world (god = world) blinds the minds of the unbelievers…” Such an interpretation would mean that the influence and ideology of this world has a way of blinding the minds of people from the truth of the gospel. Is “god” simply supposed to be a reference to this age? If so, the Greek genitive (what we usually translate as “of”) would be considered “epexegetical.” In other words, “of” in this sense stands for “namely” or “is.” It simply equates the one word with the other (such as in the phrase, “the city of New York,” where “the city” is namely, “New York”).Thus, this deity seems to be associated with what is evil and fallen. The problem with this view is that Paul does not write “God” like he normally does if he simply meant “God.” He writes instead, “the G/god of this age.” Paul associates the present age ( aiȏnos) with what is evil and fallen (1 Corinthians 1:20–21 2:6–8 3:18–19 Galatians 1:4 Romans 12:2 cf.